Blog

Tardiness and Poor School Facility Conditions are Interconnected

Posted on by Amanda Eppley, CC+S

The California Department of Education’s new California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) provides loads of insight for state and local leaders into what makes for healthy school environments…and what doesn’t. A perpetually overlooked aspect of school health and overall school climate is the condition of a school’s facilities and grounds. Here at the Center for Cities + Schools, we’ve looked at this issue in a number of studies  – and we have found alarming patterns of underinvestment in California’s K-12 facilities , which raise serious questions about whether or not children are attending school facilities that are healthy, safe, in good repair, and promoting high quality teaching and learning. A new report from WestEd, using the CHKS data finds that 32% of California’s 11th graders describe their schools as having low quality physical environments. The study finds that student perceptions of the quality of their schools’ physical environment are strongly related to the demographic composition of schools: lower rated schools have greater percentages of kids on free/reduced priced meals and higher expulsion and suspension rates. [CLICK HERE to view the full report.]

The disparity in school facility conditions may be having disparate impacts on students throughout California. In our work with high school students through UC Berkeley’s Center for Cities + Schools Y-PLAN (Youth – Plan, Learn, Act, Now!), I have seen firsthand the unique ways that school facility conditions affect students. I’d like to illustrate how these connections are sometimes hidden…but nonetheless impactful on students.

“How many of you have been tardy to a class this year?” The principal of an inner city California public high school pressed students during the question and answer portion of a presentation last month on ways to improve school climate.

The hands of four of the five presenters slowly and sheepishly raised into the air. These students had spent the previous two months researching school climate and selecting topics to tackle, from security guard relationships to student stress levels to tardiness to class. They mapped the school grounds, perused the school’s survey, drafted their own and surveyed over 200 of their peers, and conducted interviews with students and educators alike as part of the Y-PLAN methodology. Their presentation was packed with data, but lacked the personal connection, and their principal knew to push further.

“You’re all conscientious students. You know if you’re late to class you fall behind, and you get detention. Why are students still coming to classes late?” His genuine question opened the floodgates to the information he sought. The five presenters, with the help of the other 35 members of their class, chimed in with causes of tardiness that have been echoed by Y-PLAN students from struggling schools serving primarily low-income students of color from across the state and the country.

Two primary issues that emerged as the most important in this school were the quality of the lockers and the bathrooms. The lockers are old, broken, and don’t lock[JV6] . With many dating from 1965, they are older than the students’ parents. If students use broken lockers, their belongings get stolen. If their textbooks get stolen, they have to pay for them. To avoid this, they share with friends, which can cause them to be late as they wait for the friend to arrive and open the locker before navigating across the large school campus to get to class.Secondly, the bathrooms[JV7]  are in a state of disrepair. Very few stall doors lock, or even close, when they exist at all. Toilets overflow and flood the floors. In this particular school with more than 1500 students, students reported that only one stall in one girls’ bathroom was currently working properly. Students chose to wait to use the bathroom when necessary, and deal with the consequences of tardiness to class.

The principal listened intently, tracking notes as the students spoke. After a moment of silence, with a concerned tone, the principal asked “Why haven’t you told us? We don’t use these facilities, so we were unaware of the condition.”

The students hesitated before responding. His question was genuine, and one shared by caring educators everywhere. Yet the answer seemed so obvious to every student in the room that they weren’t sure where to begin.

“We didn’t expect anything to be different.” Students in our most struggling schools see images of new, clean school facilities in other places, yet walk the halls of their decrepit buildings, with no windows, with trash cans collecting rainwater leaking through ceilings, with graffiti covering their walls, with trash lining their walkways, heaters and air conditioners that don’t function, doors that do not close properly, in classrooms without enough desks, or space to put them.

Y-PLAN challenges students to tackle a school-based problem, from tardiness to recycling to school spirit. They collect primary source data and analyze it critically. They start with disparate questions, but their recommendations typically converge on one specific theme: when we allow our young people to attend schools in these conditions, they learn that we do not think they deserve any better. When the students who identify their schoolsand grounds as unclean, their buildings and yards as not in good condition are disproportionately eligible for free or reduced student lunch and are overwhelmingly African American and Latino, we reinforce their understanding of where our priorities lie. When we show them through our choices that we don’t think they deserve any better, how can we hope they still expect better for themselves?

The relationship between the quality of a school’s physical environment, its academic and school connectedness outcomes, and the racial and socio-economic background of the students illuminated by the recently released California Healthy Kids Survey will not be new information for the students who admitted that their schools and grounds are not clean and tidy, that their buildings and yards are not in good condition, and that their classrooms are so crowded they cannot concentrate. The bigger question is whether and how we will address these disparities and prove to our lower-income students of color that we know they deserve better in our hands.

Click here for the full 2015-2016 CHKS School Facilities Results report.

Amanda Eppley is the Y-PLAN Program Director at the Center for Cities + Schools at UC Berkeley. 


Detroit Students Promote the Campaign for Healthy Schools

Posted on by Shirl Buss

The Center for Cities + Schools in collaboration with Wayne State University’s Volunteers, Administrators and Coaches (VAC) have been implementing Y-PLAN Initiatives over the past nine years.  For the past two years students have been engaged in a multi-year effort to promote healthy eating and active living in the schools, housing developments, and neighborhoods in the urban core of Detroit.   As part of this effort, the children ages 4-14 at Brewster Homes and Parkside Village, created posters as a public awareness campaign to increase healthy behavior and healthier school environments.   Students, like young illustrator Martez Vance (pictured here), worked…


NEW GENTRIFIERS? STUDYING THE EFFECTS OF CHARTER SCHOOLS ON NEIGHBORHOODS IN LOS ANGELES

Posted on by Anne Robertson

By BROCK HICKS   The number—and the proportion—of students enrolled in public charter schools (independently run public schools) is increasing nationwide, particularly in urban school districts. The public policy debate in education on the pros and cons of charter schools remains tenuous and divided. Market-oriented educational reformers favor charter schools as the answer to the problems in urban public school systems; public and private funds available for constructing and running charter schools continue to increase. However, charter schools have many critics. For example, in 2016 the NAACP and the Black Lives Matter Movement passed resolutions critical of charter schools and…


City – School Partnerships A Natural Home for Health Equity:

Posted on by Cailin

Y-PLAN Richmond and the Shift Towards Health in All Classrooms As featured on the Build Healthy Places Network blog.  August 30, 2016 | Deborah L. McKoy and Megan Calpin In 2015, sixty students peered out at a local landfill as a community elder and environmental justice activist spoke about the persistent health problems caused by the city’s industrial heritage. The students are in their local high school’s health academy, and are beginning to ponder the future health and sustainability of their community. Richmond stands at a crossroads of an environmental justice and health equity movement. The land beneath their feet…


Strengthening Health Career Pipeline Diversity in Sacramento

Posted on by Diana and Lilian

As graduate students in the UC Berkeley School of Public Health, we’re surrounded every day by our colleagues - members of a new wave of health workforce.  Training this new wave of individuals has never been more important; it is projected that, in order to meet increased demand due to the aging and growing population, as well as retiring workforce, California’s health care system will need almost 500,000 additional workers by 2020. There is not only a need for additional, trained health workforce members, but also a need to ensure that this new workforce is racially/ethnically representative of the larger population.…


Join us for the Y-PLAN Japan 5th anniversary celebration!

Posted on by Marceline Graham
Tagged: events

Y-PLAN Japan was launched with the TOMODACHI Softbank Youth Leadership Program at UC Berkeley in 2012. The TOMODACHI program seeks to build U.S. Japanese relations and offer relief to residents of Japan directly affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami in 2011. To date, 700 students from Japan’s Tohoku region have participated in this exciting program committed to revitalizing their home communities. Join us on August 7th at Andersen Auditorium, UC Berkeley, to celebrate 5 years of Y-PLAN Japan and youth action for change!  Register here This evening celebration welcomes past participants, partners, host families, and others seeking to: Learn about TOMODACHI youth accomplishments since…


America’s School Buildings—Like California’s—Need Fixing

Posted on by JEFF VINCENT, PHD
Filed under: School Facilities,

Our country’s K-12 infrastructure is in crisis. Far too often, these learning environments are rundown and in disrepair, discourage and sicken children and teachers, waste energy, and fail to support a 21st century education. A new national study by the 21st Century School Fund, the National Council on School Facilities, and the Center for Green Schools sheds much-needed light on the grim reality: a $46 billion annual shortfall in funds needed to keep the country’s school buildings healthy, safe and conducive to learning. My research on California echoes the national trend: more than half of the state's school districts underspend each year on their facilities,…


Getting Local: Facilities Needs in a Northern California School District

Posted on by BRETT MITCHELL
Filed under: School Facilities,

A NEW UC BERKELEY CENTER FOR CITIES+SCHOOLS STUDY FINDS THAT MORE THAN HALF OF CALIFORNIA’S K-12 SCHOOL DISTRICTS UNDERSPEND ON THEIR FACILITIES, COMPARED TO BEST PRACTICE SPENDING STANDARDS. THIS IS A GUEST BLOG REFLECTING ON THE RESEARCH FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CALIFORNIA STATE POLICY. The new study from UC Berkeley’s Center for Cities and Schools on school facilities spending patterns in California hits home in my school district, San Juan Unified School district (SJUSD). In the study, “Going it Alone: Can California’s K-12 School Districts adequately and Equitably Fund School Facilities?”, Jeff Vincent and Liz Jain document school district efforts across…


Y-PLAN Policy Brief Featured at Urban America Forward Civil Rights Roundtable

Posted on by Deborah McKoy, Jessie Stewart

Y-PLAn Was recently featured at the Urban America Forward: Civil Rights Roundtable Series National Conference in Washington D.C. Deborah McKoy, Executive Director of CC+S, participated as part of the Healthy Communities panel, presenting the Following policy brief entitled "Planning Healthy, Vibrant Cities For and With Young People: The Power and Possibilities of Y-PLAN."   “Healthy City Planning” has the potential to challenge the status quo by creating far more integrated and equitable place-making policies and practices. This emerging framework leads planners and policymakers to “eliminate the deep and persistent inequities that plague cities” by returning urban planning to its roots in public health and social justice. Unfortunately, this…


NYC Chancellor Fariña Calls For Citywide Y-PLAN Expansion at Y-PLAN NYC Pilot Launch Event

Posted on by Amanda Eppley

“Y-PLAN is crucial to our lives, because we can see how young people have the power to make changes in society and make our voices heard.” - Y-PLAN NYC Student   On Wednesday morning, March 2nd, fifty high school students from across New York City joined their teachers, principals, superintendents, and chancellor, as well as civic leaders from across the city, at the Y-PLAN NYC Pilot Launch in the Court Room at Brooklyn Borough Hall to share their early successes and challenges in implementing Y-PLAN. An opening Gallery of Student Work allowed the young people to explain their projects to…